top of page

Election Integrity News Blog

Search

MI Court Forces Retraction from Secretary of State. Benson’s “guidance” went off the reservation.

Updated: Aug 25


The original article below was also published with the author's permission at The Federalist,



By Kristine Christlieb, MFE Senior Correspondent | August 1, 2024

 

A Michigan Court of Claims judge officially ruled the Secretary of State’s guidance on absentee ballot signature verification violated the state’s constitution and ordered it removed.

 

In a ruling signed on Tuesday, the Gov. Gretchen Whitmer-appointed judge Christopher P. Yates, declared Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s “’initial presumption’ of validity in signature verification of absentee-ballot applications and envelopes mandated by the December 2023 guidance manual issued by defendants is incompatible with the Constitution and laws of the State of Michigan.”

 

Benson’s December 2023 manual instructed clerks in more than a thousand municipal and township jurisdictions that “[v]oter signatures are entitled to an initial presumption of validity.”

 

Benson’s lawyers tried to argue the validity presumption was not prescribed, just a more modest “initial” presumption.

 

Yates didn’t buy it. In his June 12 ruling, he wrote: “With apologies to Gertrude Stein, however, a presumption is a presumption is a presumption. Whether the guidance manual includes a gentle nudge instead of a hip check, it’s still a foul under Michigan law.”

 

Sufficiently chastised, the Secretary of State’s office took steps to comply, so that by the time of the hearing on the final and official order, the offending language had already been removed from the clerks’ guidance manual.

 

But damage from Benson’s guidance had already been done. The initial presumption guidance was in place for the February 2024 Presidential primary where Michigan clerks had to verify signatures on 1.4 million absentee ballot applications and at least 934,000 return ballot envelopes.

 

The Republican National Committee and the Michigan Republican Party filed suit against Secretary of State Benson and Jonathan Brater, Michigan’s Director of Elections in April.

 

At Monday’s hearing, RNC attorney Robert L. Avers verified that the “initial presumption of validity” language had been removed from the guidance manual. But he questioned whether clerks had been notified. He pointed out what is at stake, telling Judge Yates, “I’m not trying to make a mountain out of molehill but remember the presumption [of signature validity] was applied during the presidential primary in February, and so this is a change and an important one. . . . Time is of the essence here, right? And that goes to the communication too. I mean, there’s clerks reviewing signatures right now.”

 

Erik Grill claimed a notice to clerks about the change had been sent the prior week, but he could not provide the date of the communication.

 

“Can you send that to me?” Yates said. Finally adding, “I just need to see it.”

 

The Federalist was able to obtain a copy of a memo [date not available] from a Michigan township clerk that could be the communication to which Grill alluded.

 

Addressed to “Clerks and Election Directors,” the memo alluded to a variety of changes to the manual; then, three paragraphs in, it told election officials:

 

 Additionally, an updated signature matching guidelines document has been posted in the eLearning Center. The document has been updated to remove the language in the guidance describing the signature review process as beginning with an initial assumption of validity. The specific language removed is below:

 

Voter signatures are entitled to an initial presumption of validity. An initial presumption of validity does not mean that all signatures are “presumed valid” without further review.

 

“This language has been removed under the court’s opinion in Republican National Committee v Benson, opinion and order issued June 12, 2024.”

 

In a statement to The Federalist, RNC Election Integrity Communications Director Claire Zunk confirmed all clerks have been notified.

 

She went on to explain the lawsuit’s significance: "Signature verification is a critical mail ballot safeguard to ensure ballots are cast and counted properly. Secretary Benson issued unlawful instructions - twice - while claiming Michigan's elections are transparent and secure. The RNC's legal efforts have secured this final ruling in a major victory in Michigan to protect election integrity."

 

With only five days remaining until the primary, this important matter is finally resolved. On July 10, the state of Michigan reported it had received 1.5 million applications for an absentee ballot. It is impossible to know how many of those applications’ signatures were waved through under Benson’s unconstitutional “guidance.”



______________________


Kristine Christlieb serves as senior correspondent on MFE's communications team. She publishes Trust but Verify on Substack:


 

Learn how We The People can win back and secure OUR Future.



Join us Today, August 1, at 12 PM for

the weekly Coalition Task Force Meeting


To attend this meeting, use the Registration link below . It changes weekly.


After registering, you will receive an email with details on how to join the meeting.



Note: Representatives of the media are allowed in our meetings only with prior permission.

 

Important Notes and Disclaimers for Election Integrity Network National Working Groups and coalition calls


  • We operate under strict 501 (c)(4) non-profit, non-partisan guidelines. Please do not make any comments during the call or in the chat that are directly related to any campaign or candidate running for office or could be considered an endorsement or opposition of that candidate.


  • All calls are “off the record.” This means that no members of the media are allowed on our calls without permission and this rule also applies to participants. No comment or presentation can be shared outside of the call without the express permission of the speaker. This includes the call "Notes" available to our participants. 


  • We always welcome new participants but ask that all newcomers register with their own registration link. Please do not forward your personal link to another participant.


  • For the security of the call, if you join by phone, you may be asked to unmute and provide your name. 


  • This meeting is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or instruction to lobby on behalf of any issue or organization.


 

Please donate to Michigan Fair Elections 


MFE is a fiercely independent, tax-exempt 501(c)3 charity. We rely on voluntary contributions to fund our important, and sometimes costly, work. Legal claims are sometimes essential to improve the government and protect citizen rights, and they can be expensive. MFE accepts no government funding.



Please support MFE's investigative research, honest journalism, and litigative actions to defend We the People's inalienable rights as protected in the U.S. Constitution. Donate today to assist our educational efforts to protect the principles of individual liberty in America.



 

Mark your calendars to attend Election Integrity Network's outstanding national working groups. Consider also serving as liaison to report to the Task Force Coalition's Thursday meetings.


Below is the schedule for National Working Groups August 1-8. A link to the full National Working Group Calendar for August is HERE  (All meetings are noted in Eastern time.)


Thursday, August 1

 

Monday, August 5

  • Building Local Task Forces, 5 PM, Register

 

Tuesday, August 6

 

Wednesday, August 7

 

Thursday, August 8

 

Click on the monthly NWG Calendar to register and join any meeting.


 

MARK YOUR CALENDARS


GREAT DEBATE


PIME August Meeting


 

Get FREE access to “The Inklings” video series and learn about a unique group that left a lasting literary legacy.


While attending Oxford University in the 1930s and 40s, C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien met regularly with an informal professor-student literary group named the Inklings. The Inklings meetings, as models of civil discussion and intelligent debate, stand in stark contrast to today’s cancel culture. Lewis and Tolkien, who wrote some of the twentieth century’s most beloved works of literature, credit the Inklings’ meetings for contributing significantly to their literary success.

 

Hillsdale College has produced a video series that considers Lewis and Tolkien in the context of their membership in the Inklings, and Hillsdale makes the exclusive and video series available to you FREE.

 

C.S. Lewis is best known for his Narnia books—such as The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe—and his apologetics, including Mere Christianity. Indeed, Lewis is one of the greatest Christian apologists of all time. 

 

J.R.R. Tolkien’s most renowned works are The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings trilogy. 

 

The video series, titled “The Inklings,” was filmed on the Hillsdale College campus. It examines the ideas that bound the Inklings, what they accomplished, and the continuing importance of their works today—with a special focus on Lewis and Tolkien. 

 

The Inklings are worth studying not only for their great literary achievements but also because they exemplify the free speech essential to the pursuit of truth. 

 

You can receive instant access to this free video series about the Inklings using this secure link: https://lp.hillsdale.edu/the-inklings-cca/


 

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the MFE organization. Every article written by an MFE author is generated by the author or editor alone. Links embedded within the article, however, may have been generated by artificial intelligence.


1,372 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page