Eaton County FOIA response unacceptable - and wrong!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c155e/c155ec0838cc5dce1d4664b85e7a660356e3dc78" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29852/29852b4974b43e355a37c5b7f328e414643618eb" alt="Eaton County Courthouse image. Credit: Eaton County Courthouse Square Association"
By Kristine Christlieb, MFEI News & Commentary Editor
February 24, 2025
A volunteer data analyst is celebrating a victory in his battle for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)-requested election information.
On February 14, following a 26-minute, closed-door session, the Eaton County Ways and Means Committee unanimously approved a settlement agreement with Timothy Mauro-Vetter. Officials agreed to provide, without charge, the 2024 election data Mauro-Vetter requested.
In a lawsuit filed January 15, Vetter claimed Eaton County charged an excessive fee of $854.16 to fulfill a FOIA request for electronic election data.
The lawsuit also claimed the county “wrongly demanded full payment prior to providing records” to Mauro-Vetter, “arbitrarily and capriciously violated FOIA,” and “intentionally violated FOIA or has otherwise acted in bad faith.”
FOIA requests tied to November general election
In December 2024, Mauro-Vetter conducted his regularly scheduled, monthly download of election information from Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s office. Eager to begin analyzing data from the November general election, Mauro-Vetter fully expected the December download would include data from the prior month of November and the general election, but it didn’t.
When an explanation was sought, the Secretary of State’s Board of Elections blamed the county clerks, claiming all Michigan counties had not yet uploaded their final information to the state system, and that’s why it wasn’t included.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edaa2/edaa249556ec041145f5f22996152a3b21639224" alt=""
According to Vetter, “This statement by the Board of Elections was unprecedented. Never in the past did they ever hold up publishing the voter rolls based on missing data. They’ve always published with data missing — this was nothing new — so their reason for holding it up didn’t make sense.”
Not willing to wait another month for the state’s next data download, Mauro-Vetter sent a FOIA request to each Michigan county, individually requesting information from the November general election.
“The sooner data problems are spotted the better,” explained Mauro-Vetter. “From the 2020 election, we learned the hard way we were too slow to react. I didn’t want to be nearly sixty days out from the November election before uncovering a problem, so I decided to take the lead and gather the information myself from each county.”
Vetter and his team of analysts kept meticulous records of how each county responded to their FOIA requests. Even though citizens are legally entitled to have access to election data, some counties outright refused to provide it, others ignored or somehow overlooked the request (even after multiple follow-up attempts), some charged for the data, and some fulfilled the FOIA data request quickly and at no charge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7561/d7561541a6719f9caf6b23f6a64e79079c394005" alt=""
Eaton, one of fifteen counties to charge a fee for fulfilling the data request, had, by far, the highest fulfillment fee.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30276/302764869364ac03d190d7f50b3d9d5747abcca7" alt=""
*Original fee of $854.16 was reduced on appeal to $655.15.
Thomas J. Lambert, the Michigan lawyer who represented Mauro-Vetter and whose legal expertise is FOIA litigation, says, “There is a lot of wrong that happens [in FOIA requests], but I don’t want to attribute malice to every wrong.”
In the lawsuit with Eaton County, Lambert detailed the ways officials went wrong. He pointed out they hadn’t created FOIA procedures and guidelines or made them public on the county’s website; they had “wrongly calculated fees for physical media for digital records;” they wrongly demanded full payment prior to providing records to Plaintiff [Mauro-Vetter].”
“No one wants to file a lawsuit, but sometimes it is the only way to get compliance with the law,” said Patrice Johnson, founder and chair of Michigan Fair Elections Institute (MFEI). “In the coming months, MFEI will be watching for legislation designed to weaken FOIA laws. We can’t let that happen. FOIA laws are powerful tools citizens can use to track government actions.”
Kristine Christlieb serves as senior correspondent on MFEI's communications team. She publishes Trust but Verify on Substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/trustbutverifyreport/p/voter-registration-blitzkrieg?r=2haa2x&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Learn how We The People can win back and secure OUR Future.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dc19/3dc199f593a592e646bcaeac8784334860425261" alt=""
Join us Thursday, February 27, at 12 PM for
the weekly Coalition Task Force Meeting
To attend this meeting, use the Registration link below. It changes weekly.
After registering, you'll receive an email with details on how to join the meeting.
Note: No representatives of the media are allowed in our meetings.
Important Notes and Disclaimers for Election Integrity Network National Working Groups and coalition calls
We operate under strict 501 (c)(4) non-profit, non-partisan guidelines. Please do not make any comments during the call or in the chat that are directly related to any campaign or candidate running for office or could be considered an endorsement or opposition of that candidate.
All calls are “off the record.” This means that no members of the media are allowed on our calls and this rule also applies to participants. No comment or presentation can be shared outside of the call without the express permission of the speaker. No recording can be made of the call without express permission from the moderator- this includes closed captioning.
We always welcome new participants but ask that all newcomers register with their own registration link. Please do not forward your personal link to another participant.
For the security of the call, if you join by phone, you may be asked to unmute and provide your name.
This meeting is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or instruction to lobby on behalf of any issue or organization.
Please donate to Michigan Fair Elections Institute
MFE is a fiercely independent, tax-exempt 501(c)3 charity. We rely on voluntary contributions to fund our important, and sometimes costly, work. Legal claims are sometimes essential to improve the government and protect citizen rights, and they can be expensive. MFE accepts no government funding.
Please support MFEI's investigative research, honest journalism, and litigative actions to defend We the People's inalienable rights as protected in the U.S. Constitution. Donate today to assist our educational efforts in protecting the principles of individual liberty in America.
Mark your calendars to attend Election Integrity Network's outstanding National Working Groups. Consider also serving as liaison to report to the Task Force Coalition on our Thursday News@Noon meetings.
Full list of National Working Group Meetings and meeting links:
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Michigan Fair Elections Institute. Every article written by an MFEI author is generated by the author or editor alone. However, links or images embedded within the article, may have been generated by artificial intelligence.